Return to buzzcut.com

This page was saved using WebZIP 7.0.3.1030 offline browser (Unregistered) on 04/01/07 5:38:01 PM.
Address: http://www.buzzcut.com/article.php?story=20040927220352744
Title: buzzcut.com - LvN  •  Size: 67645

   buzzcut logo
Advanced
Welcome to buzzcut.com
Sunday, April 01 2007 @ 10:30 PM UTC
     Sections   
Home
Areas of Interest
Game Theory
Notable Quotes
Newsletter
Games and Society
Critical Writing
Books and Articles
Critical Elements
Bibliography
General News

     Email Alerts   
Alert me to site updates--new articles, posts of notes and anything else making a trip back to buzzcut memorable.
Email:
Privacy policy: we will not share your name and email address with any 3rd party without your consent.

     What's New   
STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 2 wks
No new comments

LINKS last 2 wks
No recent new links

     User Functions   
Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

     Events   
There are no upcoming events

     Older Stories   
Friday 03-Mar
  • EA's "Black" opens like a film. So why doesn't it feel like one? (16)

  • Thursday 02-Mar
  • Considering Gravity (7)

  • Monday 13-Feb
  • The Medium Is Not The Message (21)

  • Thursday 19-Jan
  • All Your Readers Belong To Us (10)

  • Friday 13-Jan
  • Censorless Violence (12)

  • Tuesday 10-Jan
  • Disneyfied (Disney Fried?) (20)

  • Friday 30-Dec
  • The Escape from Xmas (14)
  • Videogames: Closing the Annoying Gap (24)

  • Tuesday 15-Nov
  • Gerbils (19)

  • Thursday 13-Oct
  • Suddenly Serious about Games (12)


  •    LvN  
     
    Monday, September 27 2004 @ 10:03 PM UTC
    Contributed by: David

    The Ludology versus Narratology debate (which I’ll just call LvN from now on!) pops up in the most surprising places.

    While at the Austin Game Conference, this little exchange took place on a panel about risk in massively multiplayer online games:

    Damion Schubert (Shadowbane) was explaining that he thought massively multiplayer gaming had gone too far down the content road. He thought developers should focus less on content and get serious about mechanics. Why? Because content is consumed by the voracious appetites of the players for play time and developers are constantly behind schedule and over budget trying to feed the content beast. Besides, the stories these content updates represent aren’t even that interesting to the players—they want to make up their own stories based on their own play.

    Rather, he thought the solution was to create places for 3,000 or so people to go and have fun. He wanted to focus on the kinds of fun things people could do while logged into the world. He pointed to football as an example and explained that people make their own stories out of the experience of being there. But it is the endless joy of watching the play unfold inside the rule system that brings the crowds back week after week.

    In response, Raph Koster (Star Wars Galaxies) asked how many people had purchased the Star Wars movies. Lots of hands went up. “More than once?” he continued. Still plenty of hands in the air and a few nervous laughs.

    His point—the story matters. Tons.

    Raph and Damion didn’t square off (no PvP). But it was fun to watch. LvN. Right there in the middle of a game development conference with real game developers arguing the same basic questions that the academics kick around.

    See, I knew all this Ivory Tower stuff was about real issues!






     
             


    LvN | 19 comments | Create New Account
    The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
    LvN
    Authored by: jccalhoun on Tuesday, September 28 2004 @ 01:20 AM UTC
    I'm not sure that consumption is the best measure. I mean, how many times have you bought a deck of cards? How many times have you bought a ball? Or to use that old standby of an example, Tetris, how many times have you downloaded or bought a version of it? I know I've done that at least 5 times for various devices.

    Story may matter, but it is not the only measure and to pretend so is foolhearty.
    [ Reply to This ]
  • LvN - Authored by: David on Tuesday, September 28 2004 @ 01:26 AM UTC
  • LvN
    Authored by: CapCom on Tuesday, September 28 2004 @ 11:03 PM UTC
    Well, I don't think developers should totally ignore content just as they shouldn't be ignoring new gameplay elements (there's that abysmal term again). Extra stuff is good, but that shouldn't be the sole crutch of a game. Perhaps it's not so much that there should be more gameplay elements and less content but more gameplay elements in addition to different kinds of content. Content means more things to see but new gameplay elements means more things to do. So while having more of one thing may not necessarily be a bad thing, having both is probably better.

    And speaking of football...sure would be cool to play Everquest football. I'm sure there are a lot of people who would stage matches, especially if there were different rules. I mean, screw tackling the players - why do that when you can hack them down with the sword or hit him with a fireball? Hehe, then some gremlins or something could carry the dead guy off the field where he'd be resucitated in the sidelines and could run back onto the field again :P

    ---
    "Until next time..."
    Captain Commando
    [ Reply to This ]
    LvN
    Authored by: gjbloom on Wednesday, September 29 2004 @ 05:58 PM UTC
    Bottom line - it is the story, or perhaps more a constellation of causally connected events, that the player takes with them after they have played. I agree that emergent stories are most compelling, as they mark the difference between passively observing a tale the game creator has written and directly creating/living an epic tale of one's own.

    Game design should utilize elements that maximize emergent story potential. One way for a designer to maintain this focus is to imagine a sequence of events that would be memorable like "persuer gets crushed between two boulders that happen to collide right after the persued passes a junction, thereby saving the bacon of the persued". The designer then creates a mechanism that allows this bit of story to unfold, like "if persued shoots Inca statue in passing, huge boulders are released that will collide at next hall junction in 5 secs." By essentially writing a few dozen "storylines" for each area of the game, the designer guarantees that high-value emergent stories will take place.

    [ Reply to This ]
    LvN
    Authored by: surelyserious on Thursday, October 07 2004 @ 11:29 AM UTC
    As long as the basic premise is sound, the story will carry itself. Pong is a story. Tetris is a story. The conflict holds the attention of the player.

    Really, if I wanted to play football online in a game, aren't I dodging the possibilities-equal-responsibilities of videogaming in the first place?

    Videogaming is: I don't want to do what I do here, I want to do what I can't do here.
    [ Reply to This ]
    LvN
    Authored by: andrewstern on Friday, October 15 2004 @ 05:53 PM UTC
    Heh, when I first read the title of this post, I
    read it as "lovin'", as in "give me some more
    of that good LvN"
    [ Reply to This ]
         What's Related   
  • More by David
  • More from Areas of Interest

  •      Story Options   
  • Mail Story to a Friend
  • Printable Story Format


  •  : site-index : Copyright © 2007 buzzcut.com
     All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
    Powered By Geeklog 
    Assimilated by Aeonserv 
    Created this page in 0.43 seconds