|
I was perusing the top 10 best-selling games for August and noticed something--there's not a single original title on the list. Every game is a sequel, spin-off or derivative work.
Just to make sure that this was as out-of whack as I suspected, I even compared the top 10 films for the end of August to see how much that industry relies on sequels to fill up its summer fun.
The following chart summarizes The NPD Group/NPD Fundworld's the top selling video games for August, and IMDB's, the top-grossing films for the last week in August:
| |
Console Game |
Platform |
Movie |
| 1 |
Madden NFL 2004 |
PS2 |
Jeepers Creepers 2 |
| 2 |
Madden NFL 2004 |
XBX |
Freaky Friday |
| 3 |
Soul Calibur II |
GCN |
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl |
| 4 |
Soul Calibur II |
XBX |
S.W.A.T. |
| 5 |
Silent Hill 3 |
PS2 |
Open Range |
| 6 |
NCAA Football 2004 |
PS2 |
Seabiscuit |
| 7 |
Soul Calibur II |
PS2 |
Freddy vs. Jason |
| 8 |
Ghost Recon: Island |
XBX |
The Medallion |
| 9 |
SW: Knights Republic |
XBX |
Uptown Girls |
| 10 |
Grand Theft Auto 3 |
PS2 |
American Wedding |
A few observations.
First, this month might be biased because of the heavy interest in the new Soul Caliber game and the annual football game buying frenzy. Also, Island Thunder and Knights of the Old Republic could be considered original titles. They are not exactly sequels. But as extensions of pre-established franchises, they are not as independent as, say, Kevin Cosnter's Open Range
On the film side of things, even if you exclude The Medallion as basically something out of the Jackie Chan franchise, the movies still can claim two new properties, Open Range and Uptown Girls. Seabiscuit is problematic because the film business has a long history of adapting literature. Remember, To Kill a Mockingbird was a novel before it was a vehicle for Gregory Peck.
So, my unscientific conclusion from this data is:
Any more questions?
Video game data from NPD Funworld
Movie data from Internet Movie Database
|
when creating a computer game, developers often have to water down their vision for technical and time-pressure reasons. A sequel can offer the opportunity to make significant improvements to the original game, bringing it closer to its potential. In this case, I think sequels are great!
e.g. Should Blizzard have made something new and original after Warcraft? No! Warcraft II was worth making, as was Starcraft.